
Saturday, 2 July 2011
RF Transceivers

Monday, 3 January 2011
Review: Swarm Robotics: From Sources of Inspiration to Domains of Application
- Robustness;
- Flexibility;
- Scalability.
- Large number of robots;
- Few homogenous groups of robots;
- Relatively incapable or inefficient robots;
- Robots with local sensing and communication capabilities.
- Tasks that cover a region;
- Tasks that are too dangerous;
- Tasks that scale-up or scale-down in time;
- Tasks that require redundancy.
Tuesday, 14 December 2010
Paper Review season is open!
2. Campo A, Nouyan S, Birattari M, Groß R, Dorigo M. Enhancing cooperative transport using negotiation of goal direction. Available at: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.146.300.
3. Cao YU, Fukunaga AS, Kahng AB. Cooperative Mobile Robotics: Antecedents and Directions. 1997;4:226-234. Available at: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.16.3358.
4. Ducatelle F, Di Caro A. G, Gambardella M. L. Cooperative Self-Organization in a Heterogeneous Swarm Robotic System. Available at: http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1830501.
5. Ferrante E. A Control Architecture for a Heterogeneous Swarm of Robots: The Design of a Modular Behavior-based Architecture. 2009;(TR/IRIDIA/2009-010):77. Available at: http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/IridiaTrSeries/IridiaTr2009-010r001.pdf.
6. Garnier S, Gautrais J, Asadpour M, Jost C, Theraulaz G. Self-Organized Aggregation Triggers Collective Decision Making in a Group of Cockroach-Like Robots. Adaptive Behavior. 2009;17(2):109-133. Available at: http://adb.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/17/2/109.
7. Holland O, Melhuish C. Stigmergy, Self-Organization, and Sorting in Collective Robotics. 2006. Available at: http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/abs/10.1162/106454699568737.
8. Kube CR. Collective Robotics: From Social Insects to Robots. Adaptive Behavior. 1993;2(2):189-218. Available at: http://adb.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/2/2/189.
9. Kunz H, Hemelrijk CK, Intelligence A. Artificial Fish Schools: Collective Effects of School Size, Body Size, and Body Form. Available at: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.139.6329.
10. Magnenat S, Rétornaz P, Noris B, Mondada F. Scripting the swarm: event-based control of microcontroller-based robots. In: SIMPAR 2008 Workshop Proceedings.; 2008. Available at: http://monicareggiani.net/simpar2008/StandardPlatform/scpr2008-03-Magnenat.pdf.
11. Magnenat S, Member S, Bonani M, Longchamp V, Mondada F. 1 ASEBA: A Modular Architecture for Event-Based Control of Complex Robots. Available at: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.172.7935.
12. Mondada F, Bonani M, Magnenat S, Guignard A, Floreano D. Physical connections and cooperation in swarm robotics. Intelligent Autonomous Systems. 2004:53. Available at: http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=IKscPz-GaxAC&oi=fnd&pg=PA53&dq=Physical+connections+and+cooperation+in+swarm+robotics&ots=Asv3PFtmVg&sig=3sN6oMwiOjlowCvzvcmgZLSwkWE.
13. Nouyan S, Groß R, Dorigo M, et al. Group Transport along a Robot Chain in a Self-Organised Robot Colony. 2005:433-442. Available at: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.60.4512.
14. Reynolds CW. Flocks, Herds, and Schools: A Distributed Behavioral Model. 1987:25-34. Available at: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.48.7069.
15. Sahin E, Spears WM, Şahin E. Swarm Robotics. (Şahin E, Spears WM, eds.). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2005:10-20-20. Available at: http://www.springerlink.com/content/cc4k8mdhbhk0uw3y/.
16. Sharkey AJC. Swarm robotics and minimalism. Connection Science. 2007;19(3):245-260. Available at: http://www.informaworld.com/10.1080/09540090701584970.
17. Timmis J, Murray L, Neal M. A Neural-Endocrine Architecture for Foraging in Swarm Robotic Systems - Nature Inspired Cooperative Strategies for Optimization (NICSO 2010) - Studies in Computational Intelligence. Springer Berlin / Heidelberg; 2010:319-330-330. Available at: http://www.springerlink.com/content/u115n2635g1w9880/.
18. Şahin E, Winfield A. Special issue on swarm robotics. Swarm Intelligence. 2008;2(2-4):69-72. Available at: http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.1007/s11721-008-0020-6.
Wednesday, 1 December 2010
Hard to get iRobots
But I simply can't buy them...
The Brazilian vendor ignore my e-mails and the international sales office automatically redirects my e-mails to the Brazilian office.
This situation is killing me.
Thursday, 28 October 2010
"Plant Neurobiology" : Smart vegetables
He studies plant neurobiology, not sure if it's cosidered a "field",formaly speaking, but it sure deserves to be. He shows evidence of a collective intelligence in plants by analyzing electric signals an plant reactions, actions, networks etc.
Monday, 25 October 2010
Social Behavior on bacteria
Wednesday, 6 October 2010
The Big Fail
Friday, 27 August 2010
MIT swarm of oil cleaners
Sunday, 13 June 2010
Presentation
Sadly it's in Portuguese by now:
Wednesday, 12 May 2010
Termites as constructors, not destroyers
Friday, 7 May 2010
Emergence
Emergence is a phenomenon that intrigues me... It's quite easy to understand:
Friday, 30 April 2010
Fancy name
but I need a "long, fancy and Portuguese" name for it. it's a hard part.
I'm thinking in something like "Desenvolvimento e análise de uma plataforma para sistemas robóticos multi-agentes colaborativos" (Development and analysis of a platform for collaborative multi-agent robotic system). Too big, too fancy...I don't like it =/
Tuesday, 13 April 2010
A Modular Architecture for Event-Based Control of Complex Robots
Friday, 26 March 2010
On centralized control
By emulated I mean: Use a computer to send a low-level command (like "move foward" and so on) and emulate the local capabilities and knowledge of each agent on software or...
Real local control: Each robot have the complete control of it's action based on real local knowledge and processing.
I started creating a table of pros and cons of each approach to help me:
Emulated:
Pros:
- Much simpler robots.
- Much Cheaper robots (an important consideration, since I'm paying for them).
- It's easier to convert the project to an academic competition (like RoboCup) since the architecture is closer.
- more... (help me to think about this)
- Expend lot of time in Computer Vision, concurrence management, communication protocols, routing and other unrelated complex software.
- Not real a swarm, since if the "brain" computer dies all agents stop...
- Have to simulate sensors response.
- more... (help me to think about this)
Pros:
- True local processing.
- Real swarm, robust in case o failure of agents.
- Focus on behavioral algorithms instead of a simulation platform.
- Real challenge for my MCU programming skills (and eLua's power =) ).
- more... (help me to think about this).
- More complex Hardware (electronics mainly).
- Expensive agents.
- More sensible to project errors (mostly a consequence of the complexity).
- Turning away from other academic activities involving the built robots (again, something like RoboCup).
- more... (help me to think about this)
Thursday, 25 March 2010
Warming up
So expect little tutorials, news about robotics and some desperate calls for help when I get stuck!
Ah! Just in case, you can know more about me and my research at the links on the sidebar.
Not too much by now, but I expect this to be useful for someone! (It will be for me =])
Just to give a taste, one of my preferred swarm robotics projects. the Swarm-Bots :
